All opinions posted. None too pathetic or contrived. Everyone gets their say.

"...even the wicked get worse than they deserve." - Willa Cather, One of Ours

Tuesday, July 06, 2004

John Edwards on the War

Command Post (Australian war news)
September 12, 2002: Edwards gives a speech on why the “IRAQI DICTATOR MUST GO,” coinciding with Bush’s speech to the UN:
As a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, I firmly believe that the issue of Iraq is not about politics. It’s about national security. We know that for at least 20 years, Saddam Hussein has obsessively sought weapons of mass destruction through every means available. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons today. He has used them in the past, and he is doing everything he can to build more. Each day he inches closer to his longtime goal of nuclear capability — a capability that could be less than a year away.

I believe that Saddam Hussein’s Iraqi regime represents a clear threat to the United States, to our allies, to our interests around the world, and to the values of freedom and democracy we hold dear.

[snip]

What’s more, the terrorist threat against America is all too clear. Thousands of terrorist operatives around the world would pay anything to get their hands on Saddam’s arsenal, and there is every possibility that he could turn his weapons over to these terrorists. No one can doubt that if the terrorists of September 11th had had weapons of mass destruction, they would have used them. On September 12, 2002, we can hardly ignore the terrorist threat, and the serious danger that Saddam would allow his arsenal to be used in aid of terror.
2. October 10, 2002: Edwards gives a speach as a co-sponsor of the declaration authorizing the use of force in Iraq:

Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.

Iraq has continued to seek nuclear weapons and develop its arsenal in defiance of the collective will of the international community, as expressed through the United Nations Security Council. It is violating the terms of the 1991 cease-fire that ended the Gulf War and as many as 16 Security Council resolutions, including 11 resolutions concerning Iraq’s efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction.

By ignoring these resolutions, Saddam Hussein is undermining the credibility of the United Nations, openly violating international law, and making a mockery of the very idea of collective action that is so important to the United States and its allies.

We cannot allow Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons in violation of his own commitments, our commitments, and the world’s commitments.

This resolution will send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.

[snip]

[W]e must be prepared to use force, if necessary, to disarm Saddam Hussein, and eliminate Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction once and for all.

Almost no one disagrees with these basic facts: that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a menace; that he has weapons of mass destruction and that he is doing everything in his power to get nuclear weapons; that he has supported terrorists; that he is a grave threat to the region, to vital allies like Israel, and to the United States; and that he is thwarting the will of the international community and undermining the United Nations’ credibility.
As I said, I like Edwards.

Iraqi vigilantes tell Zarqawi 'leave Iraq or die'

BBC
A group of armed, masked men have issued a public warning to Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to leave Iraq on pain of death. The video message was broadcast on the Dubai-based al-Arabiya TV network by a previously unknown group calling itself the Salvation Movement.

Describing Mr Zarqawi as a criminal, the men said unless he left immediately he would be hunted down and killed. Mr Zarqawi is the prime suspect in a string of attacks around the world.

We have started preparing … to capture him and his allies or kill them and present them as a gift to our people,” one of the men in the video is reported as saying. The warning extended to the friends, followers and protectors of the Mr Zarqawi. “This is the last ultimatum to those who give him shelter. This is the last warning,” the masked man says.

The radical 38-year-old Jordanian is believed to have strong links to al-Qaeda and is accused by the US of being behind a spectacular string of suicide bombings in Iraq. Mr Zarqawi’s group has also claimed responsibility for the beheadings of an American and a South Korean hostage.
This is a tremendous success for American counter-insurgency operations. It may take as many as 5 to 10 more years, but it seems clear that we can win in Iraq.

Senator John Edwards for Vice President

Political Animal (liberal)
...So far, everyone seems pretty pleased with the choice.

I am too. Edwards was my personal second choice in the primaries, so obviously I think he's qualified to be president — which certainly ought to be the uppermost consideration. What's more, he's a good speaker, he has generally good policy instincts, he's a Southerner, and while he may not be an attack dog, he can throw some pretty good barbs on the campaign trail when necessary.

The fact that Kerry was willing to choose someone who's a more charismatic speaker than himself — and will inevitably take some of his spotlight away — speaks well for him. Like they say, first rate people hire other first rate people. Second rate people hire third rate people. This was a first rate choice.
I still think Gephardt would have been a better choice, but I like Edwards a lot. The problem is that the VP won't have any real effect on voters, especially since his home state of North Carolina is a lock for Bush. You pick a VP to show you can make good decisions (Kerry accomplishes this point), and to get someone who could step in to the VP job and help your administration in some way.

Gephardt would be very helpful in dealing with congress, while Edwards has no particular area of expertise other than campaigning.

Anyway, this is all water under the bridge. Edwards will do a good job for Kerry duting the campaign, and you've got to get elected before you can govern.

This is a good beginning.

Another item: based on historical comparisons of the "who do you intend to vote for" question, Kerry should now begin to significantly pull ahead of Bush. Even contenders who have lost have had a 5-8% lead over the sitting President by the end of the party convention. Contenders who win usually have an even larger margin (12-14%).

Since this margin has historically rapidly dwindled as the election neared, it is essential that Kerry build as big a lead as possible. If Kerry doesn't have a least an 8% lead (about 52% vs 44%), than Kerry is just so much dead meat and has no chance of defeating Bush. On the other hand, if Kerry can come out of Boston with a 14% lead (about 55% vs 41%), then he has a good chance of winning.

Check the polls on the first week of August. That will tell the tale.

Iran; an enemy or a potential ally?

Iraq the Model (Iraqi Sunni from Baghdad)
An Iraqi military check point that is situated at the western bank of Shat El Arab north to the city of Faw at the Iraqi-Iranian border named Shehan was subjected to Iranian fire on Friday. The same thing happened to some Iraqi army patrols between Gazeel and Hadida north to Basra.

Colonel Dhafir Sabah Al Timemi mentioned that this was the 4th time the Iranians have opened fire on Shehan check point during the last week in addition to several other aggressions along the line from the north of Basra down to Al Shalamja.

Colonel Timemi said also that Iraqi border guards have captured 83 Iranians who were trying to cross Iraqi-Iranian borders illegally. He said that these Iranians were detained in Al Shalamcha border check point, interrogated and then were handed over to the Iranian side.

The Colonel who’s the Iraqi border guards chief in Basra said that the Iraqi side showed discipline and did not respond to the Iranian aggression in the same manner...

... I think this issue is very serious and it shows clearly that Iranian authorities attitude is a clearly aggressive one and they don’t seem to be keen on at least keeping their efforts to hinder the progress in Iraq a secret. They seem to be very frightened (and they should be) by the democratic changes in Iraq that they have lost their caution and are not considering how dangerous it is what they’re doing.

...not to forget the support and instructions they offer to their puppet Sadr through the evil Iraqi cleric "Al Ha’airi" who lives in Iran. This particular Mullah has been the source of many “Fatwas” that were printed and posted everywhere in Iraq and that encouraged violence against not only the coalition but also the Iraqi Arab Sunni in an attempt to start a civil war. It is refreshing though that they have ‘picked’ this idiot (Sadr) as their man, as there is no one who could possibly make all their efforts go in vain other than this retard...

..How to take advantage of these mistakes is a matter of strategy and the tactical points should not weigh against the ultimate goal of democratizing the Islamic world. One just have to imagine how wonderful it would be to have strong allied democracies in Iraq and Iran and the enormous effect this will have on the entire Muslim and Arab world. I know it’s a dream now but I do think it can come true.
A free and democratic Iraq would spell the doom of the theocratic fascist regime in Iran, and they know it. They will do anything they can to prevent the appearance of a new Iraq.

The Philosophy of Sexism


"The debility to which Nature condemned women incontestably proves that her design is for man, who then more than ever enjoys his strength, to exercise it in all the violent forms that suit him best, by means of tortures, if he be so inclined, or worse."

Marquis de Sade (1740-1814)