More About Me...
Email Me
Current Endeavor:
Sandy Matheson for Congress
Friends & Family
Middle East
- Back to Iraq 3.0
- Baghdad Burning
- DEBKAfile
- Deeds
- Hammorabi
- Healing Iraq
- Iraq & Iraqis
- Iraq at a glance
- IRAQ THE MODEL
- Kevin Sites
- Kurdo's World
- SISTANI.ORG
- THE MESOPOTAMIAN
Military
- Blackfive
- Boots on the Ground
- Dagger JAG
- Doc in the Box
- Coalition Casualties
- IRAQ NOW
- Sgt Hook
- StrategyPage
Media/Tech
- Ars Technica
- Command Post - War News
- EURSOC
- Gawker
- Gizmodo
- Media Notes-Kurtz
- Poynter Online - Romenesko
- Slashdot
- Wonkette
Humor
Liberal
- Altercation
- Daily Howler
- Eschaton - Atrios
- Greg Easterbrook
- The New Republic
- Political Animal
- Talking Points Memo
by Joshua Micah Marshall - TAP
- Wampum
Conservative/Libertarian
- Andrew Sullivan.com
- A Small Victory
- Belmont Club
- Citizen Smash
- Daniel W. Drezner
- InstaPundit
- Little Green Footballs
- Outside the Beltway
- Tim Blair
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Winds of Change
Reciprocal Links
Archives
- Sunday, March 21
- Monday, March 22
- Tuesday, March 23
- Wednesday, March 24
- Thursday, March 25
- Friday, March 26
- Saturday, March 27
- Sunday, March 28
- Monday, March 29
- Wednesday, March 31
- Friday, April 02
- Saturday, April 03
- Sunday, April 04
- Monday, April 05
- Tuesday, April 06
- Wednesday, April 07
- Thursday, April 08
- Friday, April 09
- Saturday, April 10
- Sunday, April 11
- Monday, April 12
- Wednesday, April 14
- Thursday, April 15
- Friday, April 16
- Saturday, April 17
- Sunday, April 18
- Monday, April 19
- Tuesday, April 20
- Wednesday, April 21
- Thursday, April 22
- Friday, April 23
- Saturday, April 24
- Sunday, April 25
- Monday, April 26
- Tuesday, April 27
- Wednesday, April 28
- Thursday, April 29
- Friday, April 30
- Saturday, May 01
- Sunday, May 02
- Monday, May 03
- Tuesday, May 04
- Wednesday, May 05
- Thursday, May 06
- Friday, May 07
- Saturday, May 08
- Sunday, May 09
- Monday, May 10
- Tuesday, May 11
- Wednesday, May 12
- Thursday, May 13
- Friday, May 14
- Saturday, May 15
- Sunday, May 16
- Monday, May 17
- Tuesday, May 18
- Wednesday, May 19
- Thursday, May 20
- Friday, May 21
- Saturday, May 22
- Sunday, May 23
- Monday, May 24
- Tuesday, May 25
- Wednesday, May 26
- Thursday, May 27
- Friday, May 28
- Saturday, May 29
- Sunday, May 30
- Monday, May 31
- Tuesday, June 01
- Wednesday, June 02
- Thursday, June 03
- Friday, June 04
- Saturday, June 05
- Monday, June 07
- Monday, June 14
- Tuesday, June 15
- Wednesday, June 16
- Thursday, June 17
- Friday, June 18
- Saturday, June 19
- Monday, June 21
- Tuesday, June 22
- Wednesday, June 23
- Thursday, June 24
- Friday, June 25
- Monday, June 28
- Tuesday, June 29
- Wednesday, June 30
- Thursday, July 01
- Friday, July 02
- Monday, July 05
- Tuesday, July 06
- Wednesday, July 07
- Thursday, July 08
- Friday, July 09
- Saturday, July 10
- Monday, July 12
- Tuesday, July 13
- Wednesday, July 14
- Thursday, July 15
- Friday, July 16
- Saturday, July 17
- Sunday, July 18
- Monday, July 19
- Friday, July 23
- Monday, July 26
- Tuesday, July 27
- Wednesday, July 28
- Thursday, July 29
- Friday, July 30
All opinions posted. None too pathetic or contrived. Everyone gets their say.
"...even the wicked get worse than they deserve." - Willa Cather, One of Ours
Friday, March 26, 2004
Military deaths and injuries in Iraq to date
Commmand Post (war news)
United States:http://www.command-post.org/2_archives/011155.html
Deaths - 584 (Hostile Action: 394; Non-hostile causes: 190)
Injuries - 3,383 (Hostile Action: 2,949; Non-hostile causes: 434)
United Kingdom: Deaths - 58
Italy: Deaths - 17
Spain: Deaths - 8
Bulgaria: Deaths - 5
Ukraine: Deaths - 3
Thailand: Deaths - 2
Denmark: Deaths - 1
Estonia: Deaths - 1
Poland: Deaths - 1
Richard Clarke KOs the Bushies
Slate (Liberal)
The ex-terrorism official dazzles at the 9/11 commission hearings.
In this case, the commission has no choice. The only chance the commission has to get the proposals in the report enacted is if they ignore Clarke's accusations completely. The final report can either be an assignment of blame to the political leadership, or a proposal for specific changes to the fix the system, but not both. Instead, all the blame will fall on the bureaucracies in the CIA and FBI (that is perfectly acceptable to the politicians).
If the commissioner’s final report supports Clarke's charges, then the report will become a political football that will generate a great deal of political attention for a time afterwards, but the substance of the report will be ignored and die a quick death.
The commissioner’s can either do something important to help the country, or they can be just another failed government commission. After all the serious work the commissioner’s have put into this report, they don't want to see the report denounced as a partisan hack job and ignored. If Clarke's charges are reaffirmed in the final report, for the sake of political survival, the Republicans will have no choice but to do just that.
You can argue the substance or you can argue the politics. In this case, politics and substance are mutually exclusive.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2097750/
The ex-terrorism official dazzles at the 9/11 commission hearings.
Richard Clarke made his much-anticipated appearance before the 9/11 commission this afternoon and, right out of the box, delivered a stunning blow to the Bush administration -- the political equivalent of a first-round knockout.Maybe, but I doubt it. When the 9/11 commission's final report is released in July, I think many people will be surprised when they discover that most of Clarke's most serious accusations will not be mentioned. These issues will be just too hot to touch.
The blow was so stunning, it took a while to realize that it was a blow. Clarke thanked the members for holding the hearings, saying they finally provided him "a forum where I can apologize" to the victims of 9/11 and their loved ones. He continued, addressing those relatives, many of whom were sitting in the hearing room:
Your government failed you and I failed you. We tried hard, but that doesn't matter because we failed. And for that failure, I would ask for your understanding and for your forgiveness.
End of statement. Applause. KO...
In this case, the commission has no choice. The only chance the commission has to get the proposals in the report enacted is if they ignore Clarke's accusations completely. The final report can either be an assignment of blame to the political leadership, or a proposal for specific changes to the fix the system, but not both. Instead, all the blame will fall on the bureaucracies in the CIA and FBI (that is perfectly acceptable to the politicians).
If the commissioner’s final report supports Clarke's charges, then the report will become a political football that will generate a great deal of political attention for a time afterwards, but the substance of the report will be ignored and die a quick death.
The commissioner’s can either do something important to help the country, or they can be just another failed government commission. After all the serious work the commissioner’s have put into this report, they don't want to see the report denounced as a partisan hack job and ignored. If Clarke's charges are reaffirmed in the final report, for the sake of political survival, the Republicans will have no choice but to do just that.
You can argue the substance or you can argue the politics. In this case, politics and substance are mutually exclusive.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2097750/
Yes, I believe it was a just war -- UPDATE
Last Fridays Evening Standard (UK newspaper)
By Andrew Gilligan
By Andrew Gilligan
The former BBC journalist who started the Hutton affair by claiming that the British government had sexed up WMD dossier that leading to the death of Dr Kelly now says the war in Iraq was just:What a flake. First he causes a political crisis by making hyperbolic statements accusing the Blair government of willful misconduct, and then he retracts it. Shmuck. FYI there is no direct link to the original article in the Evening Standard.
“One year on (since the war began), however the most important fact is that nobody’s worst fears on that wakeful night have come true. The vast majority of us, Iraqis, journalists, and Tony Blair alike, survived. Fedayeen guerrillas struck the coalition with small numbers, but there was virtually no real fighting with Sadam’s regular forces. The bombing of Baghdad looked scary on TV, but it didn’t even begin to approach the daily tonnage dropped on ,say, Hanoy[sic] during Vietnam, London or any German city during the second world war.
‘Shock and awe’ lasted an hour and a half, rather than the promised three days. And with only a few ghastly exceptions, the targeting, in the capital at least, was very precise. Colleagues who arrived after the war was over kept asking us where all the destroyed buildings were.
"There never was a military stalemate, a refugee crisis, a hundred thousand civilian dead…”
“That old doom-mongers favourite, the revolt of the “Arab street” across the Middle East, has remained as much of a mirage as any weapon of mass destruction.”
Gilligan is largely critical of Blair’s reasons for going to war, rather than the war itself. “Right war, wrong reasons” he says:
“More than anything else, what discredited the war was the rush to conflict, the need to claim Iraq as a pressing danger. From this need stemmed all the Government’s most famous tabloid half-truths and non-truths. No one I know ever doubted that Sadam had WMD, or could rebuild them quickly. It was a perfectly fair inference to draw from his behaviour, even, if it now seems to have been wrong. But no expert, spook, or politician I ever met, apart from a few New Labour androids, believed Iraq’s WMD were a threat “current and serious” enough to require military action in March 2003.”
It is a pleasure to read some fair and balanced reporting from an ex BBC man, particularly after the bashing he received during the Hutton affair, even losing his job. One wonders if he would be allowed to be so fair and balanced if he was still at the BBC.
In Army Survey, Troops in Iraq Report Low Morale
Washington Post
A slim majority of Army soldiers in Iraq -- 52 percent -- reported that their morale was low, and three-fourths of them said they felt poorly led by their officers, according to a survey taken at the end of the last summer and released yesterday by the Army.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25127-2004Mar25.html
In addition, seven in 10 of those surveyed characterized the morale of their fellow soldiers as low or very low. The problems were most pronounced among lower-ranking troops and those in reserve units...
...Patterson said he could not place the numbers in historical context because similar surveys have not been conducted before. "This is the first time we've ever gone into an active combat theater and asked soldiers how they are doing, so we have no comparative data,"...