All opinions posted. None too pathetic or contrived. Everyone gets their say.

"...even the wicked get worse than they deserve." - Willa Cather, One of Ours

Friday, March 26, 2004

Military deaths and injuries in Iraq to date

Commmand Post (war news)
United States:
Deaths - 584 (Hostile Action: 394; Non-hostile causes: 190)
Injuries - 3,383 (Hostile Action: 2,949; Non-hostile causes: 434)

United Kingdom: Deaths - 58

Italy: Deaths - 17

Spain: Deaths - 8

Bulgaria: Deaths - 5

Ukraine: Deaths - 3

Thailand: Deaths - 2

Denmark: Deaths - 1

Estonia: Deaths - 1

Poland: Deaths - 1
http://www.command-post.org/2_archives/011155.html

Richard Clarke KOs the Bushies

Slate (Liberal)
The ex-terrorism official dazzles at the 9/11 commission hearings.
Richard Clarke made his much-anticipated appearance before the 9/11 commission this afternoon and, right out of the box, delivered a stunning blow to the Bush administration -- the political equivalent of a first-round knockout.

The blow was so stunning, it took a while to realize that it was a blow. Clarke thanked the members for holding the hearings, saying they finally provided him "a forum where I can apologize" to the victims of 9/11 and their loved ones. He continued, addressing those relatives, many of whom were sitting in the hearing room:

Your government failed you and I failed you. We tried hard, but that doesn't matter because we failed. And for that failure, I would ask for your understanding and for your forgiveness.

End of statement. Applause. KO...
Maybe, but I doubt it. When the 9/11 commission's final report is released in July, I think many people will be surprised when they discover that most of Clarke's most serious accusations will not be mentioned. These issues will be just too hot to touch.

In this case, the commission has no choice. The only chance the commission has to get the proposals in the report enacted is if they ignore Clarke's accusations completely. The final report can either be an assignment of blame to the political leadership, or a proposal for specific changes to the fix the system, but not both. Instead, all the blame will fall on the bureaucracies in the CIA and FBI (that is perfectly acceptable to the politicians).

If the commissioner’s final report supports Clarke's charges, then the report will become a political football that will generate a great deal of political attention for a time afterwards, but the substance of the report will be ignored and die a quick death.

The commissioner’s can either do something important to help the country, or they can be just another failed government commission. After all the serious work the commissioner’s have put into this report, they don't want to see the report denounced as a partisan hack job and ignored. If Clarke's charges are reaffirmed in the final report, for the sake of political survival, the Republicans will have no choice but to do just that.

You can argue the substance or you can argue the politics. In this case, politics and substance are mutually exclusive.


http://slate.msn.com/id/2097750/

Yes, I believe it was a just war -- UPDATE

Last Fridays Evening Standard (UK newspaper)
By Andrew Gilligan
The former BBC journalist who started the Hutton affair by claiming that the British government had sexed up WMD dossier that leading to the death of Dr Kelly now says the war in Iraq was just:

“One year on (since the war began), however the most important fact is that nobody’s worst fears on that wakeful night have come true. The vast majority of us, Iraqis, journalists, and Tony Blair alike, survived. Fedayeen guerrillas struck the coalition with small numbers, but there was virtually no real fighting with Sadam’s regular forces. The bombing of Baghdad looked scary on TV, but it didn’t even begin to approach the daily tonnage dropped on ,say, Hanoy[sic] during Vietnam, London or any German city during the second world war.

‘Shock and awe’ lasted an hour and a half, rather than the promised three days. And with only a few ghastly exceptions, the targeting, in the capital at least, was very precise. Colleagues who arrived after the war was over kept asking us where all the destroyed buildings were.

"There never was a military stalemate, a refugee crisis, a hundred thousand civilian dead…”

“That old doom-mongers favourite, the revolt of the “Arab street” across the Middle East, has remained as much of a mirage as any weapon of mass destruction.”


Gilligan is largely critical of Blair’s reasons for going to war, rather than the war itself. “Right war, wrong reasons” he says:

“More than anything else, what discredited the war was the rush to conflict, the need to claim Iraq as a pressing danger. From this need stemmed all the Government’s most famous tabloid half-truths and non-truths. No one I know ever doubted that Sadam had WMD, or could rebuild them quickly. It was a perfectly fair inference to draw from his behaviour, even, if it now seems to have been wrong. But no expert, spook, or politician I ever met, apart from a few New Labour androids, believed Iraq’s WMD were a threat “current and serious” enough to require military action in March 2003.”

It is a pleasure to read some fair and balanced reporting from an ex BBC man, particularly after the bashing he received during the Hutton affair, even losing his job. One wonders if he would be allowed to be so fair and balanced if he was still at the BBC.
What a flake. First he causes a political crisis by making hyperbolic statements accusing the Blair government of willful misconduct, and then he retracts it. Shmuck. FYI there is no direct link to the original article in the Evening Standard.

In Army Survey, Troops in Iraq Report Low Morale

Washington Post
A slim majority of Army soldiers in Iraq -- 52 percent -- reported that their morale was low, and three-fourths of them said they felt poorly led by their officers, according to a survey taken at the end of the last summer and released yesterday by the Army.

In addition, seven in 10 of those surveyed characterized the morale of their fellow soldiers as low or very low. The problems were most pronounced among lower-ranking troops and those in reserve units...

...Patterson said he could not place the numbers in historical context because similar surveys have not been conducted before. "This is the first time we've ever gone into an active combat theater and asked soldiers how they are doing, so we have no comparative data,"...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25127-2004Mar25.html