All opinions posted. None too pathetic or contrived. Everyone gets their say.

"...even the wicked get worse than they deserve." - Willa Cather, One of Ours

Friday, March 26, 2004

Yes, I believe it was a just war -- UPDATE

Last Fridays Evening Standard (UK newspaper)
By Andrew Gilligan
The former BBC journalist who started the Hutton affair by claiming that the British government had sexed up WMD dossier that leading to the death of Dr Kelly now says the war in Iraq was just:

“One year on (since the war began), however the most important fact is that nobody’s worst fears on that wakeful night have come true. The vast majority of us, Iraqis, journalists, and Tony Blair alike, survived. Fedayeen guerrillas struck the coalition with small numbers, but there was virtually no real fighting with Sadam’s regular forces. The bombing of Baghdad looked scary on TV, but it didn’t even begin to approach the daily tonnage dropped on ,say, Hanoy[sic] during Vietnam, London or any German city during the second world war.

‘Shock and awe’ lasted an hour and a half, rather than the promised three days. And with only a few ghastly exceptions, the targeting, in the capital at least, was very precise. Colleagues who arrived after the war was over kept asking us where all the destroyed buildings were.

"There never was a military stalemate, a refugee crisis, a hundred thousand civilian dead…”

“That old doom-mongers favourite, the revolt of the “Arab street” across the Middle East, has remained as much of a mirage as any weapon of mass destruction.”


Gilligan is largely critical of Blair’s reasons for going to war, rather than the war itself. “Right war, wrong reasons” he says:

“More than anything else, what discredited the war was the rush to conflict, the need to claim Iraq as a pressing danger. From this need stemmed all the Government’s most famous tabloid half-truths and non-truths. No one I know ever doubted that Sadam had WMD, or could rebuild them quickly. It was a perfectly fair inference to draw from his behaviour, even, if it now seems to have been wrong. But no expert, spook, or politician I ever met, apart from a few New Labour androids, believed Iraq’s WMD were a threat “current and serious” enough to require military action in March 2003.”

It is a pleasure to read some fair and balanced reporting from an ex BBC man, particularly after the bashing he received during the Hutton affair, even losing his job. One wonders if he would be allowed to be so fair and balanced if he was still at the BBC.
What a flake. First he causes a political crisis by making hyperbolic statements accusing the Blair government of willful misconduct, and then he retracts it. Shmuck. FYI there is no direct link to the original article in the Evening Standard.


<< Home