All opinions posted. None too pathetic or contrived. Everyone gets their say.

"...even the wicked get worse than they deserve." - Willa Cather, One of Ours

Friday, June 25, 2004

Saddam and UBL

New York Times
Iraqis, Seeking Foes of Saudis, Contacted bin Laden, File Says
Contacts between Iraqi intelligence agents and Osama bin Laden when he was in Sudan in the mid-1990's were part of a broad effort by Baghdad to work with organizations opposing the Saudi ruling family, according to a newly disclosed document obtained by the Americans in Iraq.

American officials described the document as an internal report by the Iraqi intelligence service detailing efforts to seek cooperation with several Saudi opposition groups, including Mr. bin Laden's organization, before Al Qaeda had become a full-fledged terrorist organization...

[...]

The new document, which appears to have circulated only since April, was provided to The New York Times several weeks ago, before the commission's report was released. Since obtaining the document, The Times has interviewed several military, intelligence and United States government officials in Washington and Baghdad to determine that the government considered it authentic...
This confirms my theory. The Bushies aren't actually lying about a Saddam-UBL connection. They are just wrong about what it means.

I am a touch annoyed by the Times here. They had this for weeks. This is a fairly big story. So why publish it on a Friday instead of Monday, or Sunday? Of course, Friday is not as bad as Saturday, but not by much. Maybe publishing on Saturday would have made it look too much like they were trying to bury it.

I hate editors. I want the news straight, without editorial interference.

Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home